Sewers in America are Failing

In the United States there are estimated to be 600,000 miles of wastewater sewer lines; networks of pipes, pumping stations, and other equipment that move sewage from toilet and sink to wastewater treatment plants. Many of the oldest sewer systems dating from before the turn of the 20th century are still in service in our largest and oldest cities, and much of the sewer piping in the United States is original. As cities grew, the need for sewage and stormwater removal became necessary to protect human health. The oldest sewer systems were designed to carry both the stormwater and sanitary waste together in one system (to save money the sanitary sewers tapped into existing drain, storm and canal systems) to the nearest natural water body. Our rivers and bays had a limited capacity for dilution and as populations grew were overwhelmed by the sewage and became open cesspools of vermin, filth and foul orders devoid of all aquatic life. To alleviate the health hazards and disgusting pollution we began treating sewage waste. Until the 1960’s many sewage treatment plants only used screens and large settling tanks to remove solids and debris from sewage before releasing the effluent.

Today those steps are called primary treatment and all sewage treatment in the United States includes additional steps to ensure public health. Secondary treatments usually include biological and/or chemical treatment. One of the most common biological treatments is the activated sludge process; in which primary wastewater is mixed with bacteria that break down organic matter and cleans the water. Oxygen is pumped into the mixture. A clarifying tank allows sludge to settle to the bottom and then the treated wastewater moves on for tertiary treatment at advanced wastewater treatment plants. Coagulation, filtration and disinfection take place in tertiary treatment which also serves as a barrier to viruses, captures organics leaving secondary treatment, and precipitates heavy metals and other suspended particles.

The existing wastewater treatment systems in our cities cannot process the combined flow of stormwater and sewage and our cities struggle with solutions that they can afford. Some, like San Francisco have built a system of storage/transport boxes. The storage/transport boxes are huge underground rectangular tanks or tunnels that surround the City, the SFPUC describes them as a moat, a fitting image as the storage boxed ring the city. The storage/transport boxes catch the combined stormwater and sewage as it overflows the sewer system, but before it reaches the shoreline of the Bay or Pacific Ocean and hold the water until it can be processed. The storage/transport boxes in San Francisco have a total storage capacity of 200 million gallons and hold stormwater and sewage for later treatment at one of the wastewater treatment plants. 

In Washington DC, the Blue Plains sewage treatment plant is currently engaged in a $7.8 billion 20 year improvement program -the Clean Rivers Project adding a new stormwater storage tunnel that will hold 31 million gallons to the existing system storage for a total of 157 million gallons spread over the Anacostia River tunnels system and the new Blue Plains Tunnel. This will allow flow from the sewer collection system that exceeds the treatment capacity of the plant to overflow to the tunnel and be dewatered through a new enhanced clarification facility with a capacity of 225 million gallons a day. Retention basins, tunnels or storage tanks that can hold sewage until the water volume has eased or reconfiguring or expanding treatment facilities to increase maximum flow rates are capital intensive projects. Some cities like New York and Philadelphia, have targeted reducing stormwater flow using “green infrastructure” and low impact development strategies (LID) with BMPs (best management practices) to increase infiltration of rain and reduce the volume and velocity of stormwater.

In an existing city it is extremely hard to implement and maintain enough LID strategies to eliminate all excess stormwater flow and in NewYork City they are attempting to use the sewer piping system itself for additional storage by installing inflatable dams to block the flow of rainwater and sewage into New York Harbor in Brooklyn.  If the water pressure in the pipes gets too high, threatening to back up sewage into homes or onto streets, sensors are supposed to deflate the dam to release some water. It is a really interesting idea costing only $15.7 million for two inflatable dams, but runs the risk of increasing pressure on an aging sewer pipe infrastructure. No doubt this has all been considered and the inflatable dams are located in areas where sewer pipes have been replaced, relined or repaired. Effective storage volume increase will be 2 million gallons for each dam.   

No piping system can last forever and without continual maintenance, replacement and upgrade we have increasing instances of sewer pipe and system failure.  Failing sewer pipes can pose a significant threat to public health and the environment.  Systems with inadequate hydraulic capacity and/or blockages in the sewer pipes (not from inflatable dams) may lead to sanitary sewer overflows and sewage backing up into homes or onto streets. Untreated sewage potentially contains pathogenic microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, and protozoa. Pipe failures can be caused by hydraulic restrictions (e.g. blockages intentional or caused by debris and fats, oil and grease buildups), hydraulic capacity (the pipe being too small for the flow), and structural condition of the pipes (failure due to deterioration).

Our growing and shifting population requires investment for new sewage infrastructure and maintenance and upgrade of the existing sewage infrastructure. In addition, current sewage technologies and management approaches may not be adequate to address emerging contaminants and health threats and are certainly not adequate to maintain reliable and sanitary sewage service to the 70%-75% of the homes and businesses that are on public sewers. The U. S. EPAhas estimated that if spending for capital investment and operations andmaintenance remain at current levels throughout the country, there will be ashortfall of approximately $270 billion  over twenty years for maintaining, replacing and upgrading our wastewater infrastructure, and no source of funding to make up the shortfall.

As Rose George author of the “Big Necessity” who has studied sanitation issues and practices around the world (and written a very interesting and engaging book), points out it is not a socially acceptable topic of conversation. She believes that may be one of many reasons why wastewater infrastructure is crumbling in the United States, despite its critical importance. Out of necessity (or eroding manners) the unspeakable is becoming more often spoken of. We can no longer ignore our sewage infrastructure. No infrastructure lasts forever and we have failed to properly maintain and plan for the orderly replacement of sewage collection and treatment systems. In the United States we have never experienced the need for pipe replacement on a large scale and have taken for granted what we were given. Now we need to find a way to maintain, improve and upgrade our sewer systems and wastewater treatment plants as they become essential components of our water supply systems because the United States has slowly and quietly begun to address the availability of water by recycling wastewater. Sewage is after all 99.9% water. 

Sinkholes In America

According to the Infrastructure Report Card from the American Society of Civil Engineers, New York’s waste water infrastructure needs an investment of $21.82 billion over the next 20 years to avoid failure. Just to emphasize the point in Bay Ridge Brooklyn not far from where I once lived in the 1970’s, the street suddenly caved in on August 1st and a 30 foot wide, 10 foot deep sinkhole appeared. This was the second sinkhole in this neighborhood of Brooklyn this year. The earlier sinkhole was twice as large. The city of New York immediately began repairs. According to the City, the sinkhole was caused by a 112 year old sewer pipe that gave way and washed away the soil under the road. The sewer pipe had no doubt been failing for a long time to erode that much soil.

Picture by CBS 2 Bay Ridge, Brooklyn sinkhole

The pipes made early in the 20th century were rated for an 80 year life span. New York sewer piping systems have reached the end of their design lives, but there are no plans of a replacement and upgrade of the system. There has been no systematic replacement program. New York has kept the sewer system alive by repairing what breaks after it breaks and spraying it’s mains with concrete. When the sewer systems were built in the 19th and 20th centuries, the Boroughs of New York still had autonomy and financed and built their own systems to address the problem in the least expensive way, by using a combined storm and sanitary sewer system. The Manhattan and Brooklyn systems were built around the same time modeling the designs of Hamburg, Germany. Nonetheless, the sewers were never designed for the ages, they need to be maintained and upgraded. New York and most of the United States has not maintained and upgraded our sewer systems. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, by 2020 half the sewer pipes in the U.S. will be crumbling and the U.S. risks reversing public health, and environmental gains of the past three decades.(Rose George in The Big Necessity, The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why it Matters.)

Failing sewer pipes can pose a significant threat to public health and the environment.  Systems with inadequate hydraulic capacity and/or blockages in the sewer pipes may lead to sanitary sewer overflows and sewage backing up into homes or onto streets.  Some of the health hazards associated with basement flooding by untreated wastewater include the potential presence of pathogenic microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, and protozoa (in a nice moist dark environment). Pipe failures can be grouped into three general categories: hydraulic restrictions (e.g. blockage), hydraulic capacity, and structural condition.

Hydraulic restrictions are the most common problem in wastewater collection systems. Untreated wastewater carries sediment, grease, rags and whatever else you can think to put down the drain or flush down the toilet. The grease congeals with sediment and blockages form. In combined sewers, large items thrown or washed into the storm system create obstructions and restrictions during peak flow times. This can lead to street and basement flooding. Tree root intrusion, sediment accumulation, and grease build-up all contribute to hydraulic restrictions. Aging pipes that sag over time and joints that begin to fail can slow pipe flow and create more favorable conditions for solids to build up in pipes. An ongoing maintenance program for cleaning and flushing sewers is typically adequate to control blockages. However, budgeting for routine preventative maintenance and repairs has not taken place in New York or the rest of the United States. We fix it when it breaks.

Failure caused by inadequate flow capacity is common in combined sewer systems, but may also a sign of other types of problems such as structural defects or design defects. Major sources of pipe structural defects are cracks, broken pipes, and leaks. Pipes sag and sewage does not flow properly, areas of inadequate pipe slope can be due to loss of pipe bedding or inadequate initial slope. Structural failure as in Bay Ridge is typically caused by defects of the pipe wall and/or the soil envelope used to support the pipe.

The EPA reported that the total investment needs of America's publicly owned treatment works as of January 1, 2004, was $202.5 billion and increasing each year. Many systems besides New York have reached the end of their useful design lives, and the nation’s wastewater systems are no longer resilient in their ability to prevent failure, or restore service after a disruption. In addition, the electrical generation and distribution system, the energy sector, contributes to the lack of system’s resilience. Pumps and wastewater treatment plants do not operate without power and reduced reliability of the power supply is increasingly being addressed through the construction of dedicated emergency power generation at wastewater treatment plants and drinking water delivery systems.  Clean and safe water should be the national priority. If we had spent even a quarter of the  $821 billion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on the very unglamorous sewers and water treatment systems if the country we would have a cleaner environment, part of our infrastructure would be ready for another century and construction workers would have had jobs. 

Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development

United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) is taking place this week, June 20-22, 2012 in Rio de Janeiro Brazil to mark the 20th anniversary of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, and the 10th anniversary of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg. Sustainable development’s goals are to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It is an ideal that is seen as the guiding principle for long-term global sustainable development and consists of three pillars: economic development, social development and environmental protection.  

The first UN Conference on Environment and Development was held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992 and adopted an agenda for development in the 21st Century, “Agenda 21 : A Programme of Action for Sustainable Development.” Agenda 21 is the integration of environment and development concerns to fulfill the basic needs of all people (very broadly defined), improved living standards for all, better protected and managed ecosystems and a safer, more prosperous future for all. The plan was to achieve this in a global partnership for sustainable development paid for by the first world nations of 1992. The economic development principals detailed in the Agenda tend to sound like world socialism, but that happens when the goal is for every human being to share equally in food, water, wealth and to use the minimum resources to maximize the number of people who can live on the planet. I expect that the Rio +20 conference will fail with European nations currently under economic stress back peddling on the developing world’s expectations for aid and China and India not using their resource to solve their own problems. The U.S. is sending Secretary Clinton and hosting a U.S. Conference Center.

U.S. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is participating in the Rio +20 conference and has a US Center set up to hold events related to climate change, green economies, sustainable agriculture and sustainable cities. Events at the US Center will be live streamed at http://conx.state.gov/event/rio20/ if you want to watch the events the U.S. is hosting. The UN proceedings are being streamed at this link if you prefer to watch those. Live streaming is a nifty opportunity for those of us who will never have the opportunity to attend the live conference.  http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/conferencessummits/rio20-13-22-june-2012-rio-de-janeiro-brazil/press-conferences/watch/forests-rio-dialogues-session-5-press-conference-rio20/1694285685001

While the stated objectives of Rio+20 are grand and broad. The most basic need is for every human to have access to clean drinking water and adequate sanitation. According to Rose George in her book “The Big Necessity,” there are 2.6 billion people on earth without a toilet. The lack of sanitation is the real cause of most dirty drinking water, and results in the death of 1.8 million children each year.  “The…2006 Human Development Report, and annual publication of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), wrote that ‘when it comes to water and sanitation, the world suffers from a surplus of conference activity and a deficit of action.’” The need to improve the level of basic water and sanitation services and the management of the world's water resources as well as wastewater has been emphasized at both previous Earth Summits, Rio (1992) and Johannesburg (2002). These conferences called for actions to improve the way water is managed and used, but has diluted the message with other agendas. Water and especially sanitation services for the poor are lagging behind in key regions of the world and are being buried at the pre-conference meetings by other agendas.