The following is excerpted from a Rice University news release and a MIT news release:
In the early 21st century vehicles using
hydrogen-powered fuel cells rivaled electric vehicles with batteries (EVs)
as the best way to decarbonize the car industry by replacing gasoline. Today,
EVs are way ahead and IRA has clearly chosen their winner- EVs. The big car
companies are trying to rapidly electrify their vehicle offerings, but are
facing resistance from the consumer. On of the resistant is my husband who
really wants a hydrogen car.
Research at MIT found that the lifetime cost of ownership
for a fuel cell car has come down in recent years, but remains higher than EVs
largely because of the cost of hydrogen fuel. The researchers found the total
cost of ownership for hydrogen was around 40% higher than a comparable gasoline
vehicle, and about 10% higher than an EV.
EVs have another crucial advantage over hydrogen. There
already exists a vast nationwide electrical system. A nationwide transition to
electric vehicles creates big challenges, including the need to build a
charging network and make plenty of extra electricity to power all these cars
and trucks.
Hydrogen has its own advantages. The fuel can be pumped in
less time than it takes to charge an EV battery, and it can deliver longer
driving ranges more in line with gasoline cares. Hydrogen more closely
resembles the pump-and-go experience everyone knows from using gasoline.
However, that experience would require creating an enormous amount of hydrogen
and then moving itto refueling stations all over the country.
Innovations to make hydrogen cleaner and cheaper could help
make fuel cell vehicles competitive once again and possibly more desirable. Until
now the methods used to make hydrogen it either generate too much carbon
dioxide or are too expensive. Green hydrogen, produced using renewable energy
sources to split water into its two component elements, costs roughly
$5 for just over two pounds.
"The main form of hydrogen used today is 'gray'
hydrogen, which is produced through steam-methane reforming, a method that
generates a lot of carbon dioxide" said James Tour, a materials
scientist. Most of the nearly 100 million tons of hydrogen used globally in
2022 was grey hydrogen derived from fossil fuels, and its production generated
roughly 12 tons of carbon dioxide per ton of hydrogen.
Recently researchers from Rice University (James Tour
and Kevin Wyss) have found a way to harvest hydrogen from waste plastic using a
low-emissions method that could more than pay for itself.
The researchers converted mixed waste plastics into
high-yield hydrogen gas and high-value graphene. The researchers exposed
plastic waste samples to rapid flash Joule heating for about four seconds,
bringing their temperature up to 3,100 degrees Kelvin. The process vaporizes
the hydrogen present in plastics, leaving behind graphene — an extremely
light, durable material made up of a single layer of carbon atoms.
"When we first discovered flash Joule heating and
applied it to upcycle waste plastic into graphene, we observed a lot of
volatile gases being produced and shooting out of the reactor," Wyss said.
"We wondered what they were, suspecting a mix of small hydrocarbons and
hydrogen, but lacked the instrumentation to study their exact
composition."
"We know that polyethylene, for example, is made of 86%
carbon and 14% hydrogen, and we demonstrated that we are able to recover up to
68% of that atomic hydrogen as gas with a 94% purity," Wyss said. The
scientists hope that this work will allow for the production of clean hydrogen
from waste plastics, possibly solving both the major environmental challenge of
plastic pollution and the greenhouse gas-intensive production of hydrogen by
steam-methane reforming.
No comments:
Post a Comment