The Conowingo Dam is a large hydroelectric dam on the Lower Susquehanna River about 10 miles upstream from where the river flows into the Chesapeake Bay at Havre De Grace, Maryland. The three dams at the downstream end of the Susquehanna River have been important in mitigating the downstream transport of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment from the Susquehanna River watershed to the Chesapeake Bay. The Conowingo, the last dam in a series of three traps polluted sediment from the Susquehanna River in its 9,000 acre reservoir.
When the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (Bay TMDL)
was established in 2010, it was estimated that the reservoir behind the
Conowingo Dam would trap sediment and associated nutrients through 2025.
However, studies conducted over the last several years demonstrated that the
reservoir has reached dynamic equilibrium (i.e., the reservoir is near full
capacity).
The Conowingo Dam will no longer be able to trap sediment in
the Susquehanna River and prevent them from entering the Chesapeake Bay. The
Susquehanna River flows 464 miles from Cooperstown, New York to Havre De Grace,
Maryland collecting sediment and nutrient runoff along the way. The Susquehanna
drains an area of more than 27,000 square miles and is the single largest
source of fresh water flowing into Chesapeake Bay. The river currently provides
nearly half of the Bay’s freshwater, 41% of its nitrogen, 25% of its phosphorus
and 27% of its sediment load. Without the Conowingo removing sediments
containing nitrogen and phosphorus the reductions in sediment, nitrogen and
phosphorus will have to come from somewhere else.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s has developed a separate Conowingo
Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) that outlines the programmatic and numeric
commitments that need to be taken to reduce the adverse water quality impacts
to the Chesapeake Bay resulting from Conowingo Dam infill, as well as a
timeline at which those reductions could be achieved. The Conowingo WIP strategy
primarily focuses on the even more implementation of agricultural BMPs to
reduce 6 million pounds of nitrogen in the Susquehanna River Basin.
A draft Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) was developed by
a committee consisting of representatives from the Chesapeake
Bay Commission and each Chesapeake Bay watershed jurisdiction – Delaware,
the District of Columbia, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West
Virginia – and supported by the Center for Watershed Protection to assign the additional
reduction of 6 million pounds of nitrogen and 0.26 million pounds of phosphorus
needed to mitigate the water quality impacts of Conowingo Dam infill.
EPA states in their news release that it “recognizes that
the Conowingo WIP will continue to evolve based on implementation successes and
challenges,” but noted that “critical to the successful implementation of the Conowingo
WIP is to ensure that the plan complements and does not compete with the
jurisdictions’ Phase III WIPs in terms of opportunities for BMP implementation
and resources, including technical assistance, staffing, and funding.”
The evaluation states that “it is currently unclear” how the two efforts will
be distinguished and recommends that the final CWIP “provide more detail on
where exactly implementation will be targeted and the affected stakeholders.”
The EPA evaluation also recognizes that the Conowingo WIP
financing strategy is still under development, but notes “there is currently
little confidence that the Conowingo WIP will be fully implemented to meet the
necessary nitrogen reductions without dedicated funding mechanisms in place and
the commitment from the public sector to provide an initial investment to
initiate Conowingo WIP implementation.”
Unlike the individual state WIP III, EPA does not approve or disapprove the Conowingo
WIP. However, EPA does provide its
evaluation and provide recommendations for strengthening the Conowingo WIP. The
EPA has completed its evaluation of the draft Conowingo WIP to mitigate and
additional 6 million pounds of Chesapeake Bay pollutants no longer being
trapped in a reservoir behind the Conowingo Dam. The EPA has expressed concerns
that there is no way to distinguish Conowingo WIP restoration actions from
others already pledged, as well as the need for a dedicated funding mechanisms
and public sector financial commitments for the additional work.
Let’s be honest here. Implementation of Agricultural BMPs in
the Susquehanna River Basin has lagged even without these additional goals, and
climate projections for our region forecast that on average, precipitation in
the region is projected to increase by around
8% by 2040, and temperature is projected to increase by 2.16 °C (3.9 °F). “Because
warmer air can hold more moisture, heavy rainfall events ...are projected to
increase in frequency and severity as the world continues to warm. Both the
intensity and rainfall rates of Atlantic hurricanes are projected to increase
with the strongest storms getting stronger in a warming climate. Recent
research has shown how global warming can alter atmospheric circulation and
weather patterns such as the jet stream, affecting the location, frequency, and
duration of these and other extremes,” says the Fourth National Climate Assessment.
The bottom line here is no matter what mankind does, in the next couple of
decades the expected impacts from climate change are going to happen. At this point, Human's actions can only have impact on the second half of
the 21st century. The Conowingo Dam cannot be left full. It will not exist in
some gentle equilibrium. The Conowingo and its sister reservoirs will not be
constantly filled to capacity with sediments because of short-term changes from
severe storms that cause scour and a subsequent reduction in exported sediments
until the scoured amount is refilled. Therefore, the amount of sediment
transported out of the reservoirs will not always be in equilibrium with the
amount of sediment transported into the reservoirs. Dredge it. Just put the
bill into one of the multitrillion dollar spending plans. The senators from
Virginia, Maryland, New York, and Delaware could simply come together to
require the inclusion of the restoration of the Conowingo Dam in one of the
bills. Long term capital improvements are the sorts of things that should be
financed.
See Also: Hirsch, R.M., 2012, Flux of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment from the
Susquehanna River Basin to the Chesapeake Bay during Tropical Storm Lee,
September 2011, as an indicator of the effects of reservoir sedimentation on
water quality: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report
2012–5185, 17 p.
No comments:
Post a Comment