Last Thursday, Governor Wes Moore announced an agreement with Constellation Energy to fund and implement operational improvements and some environmental projects at the Conowingo Dam. The total commitments are valued at more than $340 million and were negotiated in partnership with Waterkeepers Chesapeake and Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper Association. A previous $240 million agreement with the former dam operator was challenged in court by the Riverkeepers and Waterkeepers.
“The Chesapeake Bay is the keystone to Maryland’s prosperity,” said
Gov. Moore. “This agreement will lead to real improvements in water
quality in the biggest tributary of the Chesapeake Bay, while securing the
future of one of our state’s largest clean energy producers. By bringing
everyone to the table, we have struck an agreement that is good for the
environment, good for energy production, and good for Marylanders.”
The agreement clears the way for the re-licensing and continued operation of
the dam’s hydroelectric facility on the Susquehanna River, which is the
largest source of renewable energy in the state. The terms of the agreement,
announced today at the dam, include operational improvements and upfront and
ongoing annual payments:
- Water
quality and resiliency: $87.6 million for pollution reduction and
resiliency initiatives, including shoreline restoration, forest buffers,
fish passage projects and planting underwater grasses that produce oxygen,
stabilize sediments and provide habitat for countless species.
- Trash
and debris removal: $77.8 million to improve trash removal
program that currently clears an average of about 600 tons of debris each
year.
- Aquatic
life passage: More than $28 million for fish and eel passage
improvements and protections at the dam, helping American
shad, river herring, and freshwater mussels rebound while
reconnecting habitats across the Susquehanna.
- Freshwater
mussel restoration: $23.3 million to build and operate a hatchery
that will seed the river with mussels, which are natural filters
that clean the water and reduce pollution flowing into the Bay.
- Dredging: $18.7
million for additional studies on dredging.
- Invasive
species management: $9.4 million to control destructive species
like snakeheads and blue catfish, protecting the river’s ecosystem.
- The
Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper Association and Waterkeepers
Chesapeake will have an ongoing role in aspects of the implementation
of the certification and settlement agreement.
“This historic agreement ensures that our children and
grandchildren will inherit a Chesapeake Bay and
Susquehanna River that are cleaner and healthier than they are
today,” said Attorney General Anthony G. Brown. I do not know
if this is indeed a historic agreement, but it does seem better than the last
one that failed.
The Conowingo Dam is a large hydroelectric dam on the Lower
Susquehanna River about 10 miles upstream from where the river flows into the
Chesapeake Bay at Havre De Grace, Maryland. Not only is the Conowingo Dam the largest source of renewable energy in Maryland, the three dams at the downstream
end of the Susquehanna River have been important in mitigating the downstream
transport of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment from the Susquehanna
River watershed to the Chesapeake Bay. The Conowingo, the last dam in a series
of three traps polluted sediment from the Susquehanna River in its 9,000-acre
reservoir.
When the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (Bay TMDL)
was established in 2010, it was estimated that the reservoir behind the
Conowingo Dam would trap sediment and associated nutrients through 2025.
However, the reservoir reached dynamic equilibrium (i.e., the reservoir is near
full capacity) more than a decade earlier than thought
The Conowingo Dam can no longer trap additional sediment in
the Susquehanna River and prevent them from entering the Chesapeake Bay. That
is what dredging studies are about. If it is feasible, the dredging could allow
the Conowingo Dam to once more capture the nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment washed
into the river by rainstorms.
The Susquehanna River flows 464 miles from Cooperstown, New
York to Havre De Grace, Maryland collecting sediment and nutrient runoff along
the way. The Susquehanna drains an area of more than 27,000 square miles and is
the single largest source of fresh water flowing into Chesapeake Bay. The river
currently provides nearly half of the Bay’s freshwater, 41% of its nitrogen,
25% of its phosphorus and 27% of its sediment load. Without the Conowingo
removing sediments containing nitrogen and phosphorus the reductions in
sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus necessary to meet the goals of the Chesapeake
Bay Agreement will have to come from somewhere else.
Let’s be honest here. Implementation of the various state’s watershed
plans to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment in the Chesapeake Bay failed
to meet the targets set in 2012. In addition, climate projections for our
region forecast that on average, precipitation in the region is
projected to increase by around 8% by 2040, and temperature is projected to
increase by 2.16 °C (3.9 °F). “Because warmer air can hold more moisture, heavy
rainfall events ...are projected to increase in frequency and severity as the
world continues to warm. Both the intensity and rainfall rates of Atlantic
hurricanes are projected to increase with the strongest storms getting stronger
in a warming climate. …” says the Fourth National Climate
Assessment.
The bottom line here is the Conowingo Dam cannot be left full. It will not
exist in some gentle equilibrium. The Conowingo and its sister reservoirs will
not be constantly filled with sediments because of short-term changes from
severe storms that cause scour and a subsequent reduction in exported sediments
until the scoured amount is refilled. Therefore, the amount of sediment
transported out of the reservoirs will not always be in equilibrium with the
amount of sediment transported into the reservoirs. Dredging does seem to be
the answer, but there are so many problems with the source water for the region;
we need to indeed study the issue.
See Also: Hirsch, R.M., 2012, Flux of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment from the
Susquehanna River Basin to the Chesapeake Bay during Tropical Storm Lee,
September 2011, as an indicator of the effects of reservoir sedimentation on
water quality: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report
2012–5185, 17 p.
No comments:
Post a Comment