Reager, J. T., Molotch, N. P., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2026). Net groundwater recharge in California occurs primarily during above-average snowpack years. Geophysical Research Letters, 53, e2026GL122396. https://doi.org/10.1029/2026GL122396
The below is excerpted from the research letter cited above.
Dr. John T. Reager, a water scientist at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and colleagues analyzed the GRACE and GRACE FO* satellite data and estimate how much groundwater recharge has occurred annually in California since 2004. They found that the state’s aquifers have had a net gain in only six of 18 years, and years with lots of snow led to the biggest rises in underground water.
In the Central Valley, groundwater has been dropping for about
100 years as wells and pumps pull up water to irrigate crops and make up the
difference when water allocations are cut. The historical maximum of 28 to
30 feet was measured southwest of Mendota in a famous USGS photo. Since
that time other areas of the central valley have experienced over draft of
groundwater and subsidence. The all resulted in the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA), which has yet to prevent the overdrawing of groundwater.
“Nonetheless, California's Central Valley is one of the most
heavily managed groundwater systems in the world, supplying much of the state's
water use during dry periods and supporting a highly productive agricultural
region. Long‐term groundwater withdrawals have led to sustained
declines in aquifer storage over the past several decades (e.g., Liuet al.,
2022), particularly during multiyear droughts when surface water availability
is limited.”
Despite the importance of groundwater in buffering the region from drought, basin‐scale monitoring of groundwater recharge the satellite data from GRACE and GRACE‐FO observations reveal basin‐scale net groundwater recharge events in California are very rare. The net positive recharge years (when more water is added to groundwater stores than is pumped out) are strongly associated with above‐average snowpack years. Thus, future warming may reduce the likelihood of recharge‐capable years.
The data used in this study came from GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) and
its successor, GRACE-FO (GRACE Follow-On), are joint satellite missions
between NASA and German research partners (DLR and GFZ) designed to track the
movement of mass across the Earth by measuring changes in its gravitational
field over time. The original GRACE mission operated from 2002 to 2017. GRACE-FO
was launched in May 2018 (yeah SpaceX) after the first satellite had
failed.
Unlike typical remote sensing satellites that observe the
planet using reflected light or to look down at the surface. Instead, GRACE
uses two identical satellites flying in tandem to act as a highly
sensitive scale. Because water is incredibly heavy, its seasonal and multi-year
movement constitutes the largest variable source of changing mass on Earth.
GRACE and GRACE-FO provide critical monthly global maps of these regional
variations, unlocking insight across years.
This years of data creates a time series of water data
allows the researchers to derive the groundwater over time. By subtracting the
measured surface water. The first derivative of a time data series represents the
rate of change of the measured variable with respect to time. In physical terms,
it allows the scientist to observe the recharge rate of groundwater.
Groundwater storage changes were estimated as the residual
of the terrestrial water balance:
GWA(t) = TWSA(t) – SWEA(t) – SWA(t) – SMA(t) + E(t),
where GWA represents groundwater anomaly, derived from
terrestrial water storage changes (TWSA) and sub-tracting out snow water
equivalent changes (SWEA), surface water storage changes (SWA), and soil
moisture storage changes (SMA). (We’ll leave off the discussion of the fudge
factor E in this short discussion).
By separating groundwater changes from other water stores such
as snow, soil moisture, and reservoirs, they estimate when net groundwater
recharge occurs and how large itis. The researcher found that basin‐scale
net groundwater recharge is rare and has occurred in only 6 years since
2004. Importantly, years with groundwater recharge are more strongly linked to
unusually large snowpack in the Sierra Nevada than to high rainfall alone. Even
during the exceptionally wet winter of 2023, which produced record snowpack,
only a small fraction of the total precipitation was retained as groundwater,
and this gain did not offset long‐term groundwater losses. These
results suggest that future groundwater replenishment in California depends on
substantial snowpack, which is expected to decline as the climate warms. As
more precipitation falls as rain rather than snow, opportunities for large‐scale
groundwater recharge may become increasingly limited.
Groundwater recharge is a complex Earth system process that
has been identified by the National Academy of Sciences as critically important
to our source waters and poorly
monitored. Distinguishing between mechanisms of groundwater recharge is
essential for assessing how groundwater recharge potential may evolve under a
warming climate and that is expected to shift precipitation from snow toward
rain, and land use change that may alter the mechanics of recharge and snow
melt.
Though, land subsidence does not directly cause the
disparity between rainfall and snowfall recharge, which is primarily governed
by the physical delivery timeline of the water. However, decades of compaction
significantly compound the issue by reducing the aquifer system's vertical
permeability and capacity to absorb rapid surface water inputs. When decades of
groundwater over-extraction cause land subsidence, the fine-grained clay
layers (aquitards) within the aquifer system undergo irreversible compaction.
This structural collapse dramatically alters how the subsurface interacts with
different water delivery rate.
Net groundwater recharge reflects a balance between climatic
inputs and anthropogenic withdrawals. During dry years with limited surface
water availability, continued groundwater pumping results in net depletion,
whereas during wet years, reduced pumping and enhanced infiltration allow for
net recharge (e.g., Famiglietti et al., 2011). Recharge pathways in California
include diffuse infiltration, managed recharge, and recharge associated with
prolonged snowmelt and runoff from the Sierra Nevada. While basin‐scale
GRACE observations cannot resolve individual pathways, the strong association
between net recharge and high snowpack is consistent with enhanced focused and
mountain‐front recharge during years with sustained snowmelt.
Several high‐precipitation years did not
correspond to the largest recharge events, whereas water year 2023 coincided with record‐high
Sierra Nevada snowpack, indicating that precipitation alone may be insufficient
to produce basin‐scale net recharge. The magnitude of recharge in wet
years further emphasizes the limits of basin‐scale recovery. Across the six net‐positive
recharge years since 2004, annual net groundwater gains amount to approximately
20%–45% of April 1 Sierra Nevada snowpack. The researchers found that only a portion of
the snow pack was converted into net groundwater gain.
These results suggest that groundwater recharge is not only
through total water input, but also through its control on the timing and
persistence of water availability. Snowmelt provides a delayed and sustained input
of water that extends into spring and early summer, when evaporative demand
remains relatively low and infiltration conditions are more favorable. In this
sense, snowpack acts as a gating condition for basin‐scale recharge,
enabling sustained infiltration beyond the peak precipitation period rather
than serving as an independent water source.
This is an important piece of work, the methodology can be
used in other climates and geologies to determine groundwater recharge and its
drivers.
No comments:
Post a Comment