Blazer, V.S., Walsh, H.L., Smith, C.R. et al. Tissue distribution and temporal and spatial assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) in the mid-Atlantic United States. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 59302–59319 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35097-6
The article below is to a large extent excerpted from the
research paper cited above and the USGS press release.
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) do not occur in
nature, they are an entirely synthetic substance. Yet, most people in the
United States have been exposed to PFAS, and have PFAS in
their blood, especially perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA).
There are thousands of PFAS chemicals, and they are found in
many different consumer, commercial, and industrial products. Various
PFAS chemicals have been widely used for over 80 years mainly for their ability
to repel oil, grease, water, and heat. PFOS and PFOA found in Scotch Guard and
in Teflon and traditional Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) - the foam used to
fight aviation and other chemical fires -were the first to become widely
commercially successful.
PFAS are called “forever chemicals” as they do not easily
breakdown, and so build up in the environment and in tissues, apparently both
human and animal. Human exposure to PFAS has been linked to health issues, such
as kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, liver damage, developmental
toxicity, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol, and immune dysfunction.
However, much less is known about the effects of PFAS on fish health and fish
populations.
Fish and other aquatic organisms can ingest PFAS from water,
and diet. In 2013, the U.S. Geological
Survey, in cooperation with state natural resource agencies in Maryland,
Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, began monitoring smallmouth bass (SMB, Micropterus
dolomieu) in response to fish mortalities, numerous types of skin lesions,
intersex, and other signs of endocrine disruption and population declines
(Blazer et al. 2007, 2010, 2020;
Smith et al. 2015;
Walsh et al. 2018, 2022;
Keplinger et al. 2022).
A suite of biological indicators and monthly surface water samples for analyses
of pesticides, hormones, phytoestrogens, and pharmaceuticals were monitored at
four sites (two in the Potomac River, Maryland, and West Virginia and two in
the Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania).
Smallmouth bass are an economically important sportfish that
have experienced disease outbreaks and populations declines in numerous
Chesapeake Bay watersheds. PFAS may have adverse health impacts on smallmouth
bass. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate the concentration of
PFAS in smallmouth bass tissue samples.
Adult smallmouth Bass were collected at ten sites between
2014 and 2021 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Maryland Department of
Natural Resources (MD DNR), Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PA FBC),
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) and West Virginia
Division of Natural Resources (WV DNR).
PFAS were not part of the analyte list; however, the researchers
stored and archived the plasma from four
long-term monitoring sites. Four PFAS (PFOS, PFDA, PFUnA, PFDoA) were
detected in every smallmouth bass plasma sample, and concentrations of PFOS
were considerably higher than the other three compounds.
The sampled sites represented some area of urban,
agricultural, and forested lands in and around the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The
highest total plasma concentrations of PFAS were found in smallmouth bass
collected from two sites. These two sites had the highest percentage of
developed land and the greatest number of EPA-identified sources of PFAS
(including military installations and airports). Intermediate PFAS
concentrations were found at sites with agricultural land. The lowest PFAS
concentrations were found at sites with the highest percentage of forested
land.
The with the lowest concentrations of PFOS and total PFAS
had the largest drainage areas (3150.6 to 2207.7 sq km), the lowest developed
land cover (3.2–4.5%), moderate to low agricultural land cover, and low number
of PFAS facilities.
PFAS were detected in the plasma of smallmouth bass at all sites,
including sites with a low percentage of developed land and sites with a low
number of PFAS sources. This suggests that PFAS may be widespread in Chesapeake
Bay waters and in smallmouth bass.
Developed and agricultural land may be associated with PFAS
in surface water, land application of biosolids and/or the food chain.
PFAS concentrations were low in the muscle tissue of
smallmouth bass, even in fish that had high plasma concentrations. The low
concentration of PFAS in muscles suggests a minimal risk of human exposure to
PFAS from eating smallmouth bass.
Concentrations measured in blood and other organs may be
associated with health effects observed in smallmouth bass populations and
require further study.
No comments:
Post a Comment